Essay Structure

Essay Structure You must limit your entire essay to the topic you have introduced in your thesis statement. For most essays, one well-developed paragraph is sufficient for a conclusion. Once you’ve got two nice, safe ideas down on paper, you should be in a position to think of something a bit less conventional. When you’re at school, your teacher might be marking your essay alongside those of twenty other people . If you follow the basic structure below, you will be able to build effective paragraphs and so make the main body of your essay deliver on what you say it will do in your introduction. When these paragraphs are put together with appropriate links, there is a logical flow that takes the reader naturally to your essay's conclusion. The main body of your essay is where you deliver your argument. By assigning a word count, teachers get a more accurate length of essay than they would if they assigned homework by pages. However, if you're blessed with the ability to write immaculately and at speed, you may not need this long to edit your essay. If so, allow yourself a little more time after dinner to finish writing your essay. A passionate essay writer always wants to add multiple arguments in his/her essay. Don’t stop to allow yourself to think about it; just write. The third idea is also about letting yourself think a little more out of the box. The writer must build a case using facts and logic, as well as examples, expert opinion, and sound reasoning. The writer should present all sides of the argument, but must be able to communicate clearly and without equivocation why a certain position is correct. A cousin of the narrative essay, a descriptive essay paints a picture with words. But in a short essay, you have to control yourself. Only put useful arguments and weed out irrelevant ones. Professors often ask students to write reading reflections. They do this to encourage you to explore your own ideas about a text, to express your opinion rather than summarize the opinions of others. Reflective writing can help you to improve your analytical skills because it requires you to express what you think, and more significantly, how and why you think that way. While like an expository essay in its presentation of facts, the goal of the persuasive essay is to convince the reader to accept the writer’s point of view or recommendation. Its building blocks are well structured, academic paragraphs. Each paragraph is in itself a smaller argument and when put together they should form a clear narrative that leads the reader to the inevitability of your conclusion. The reason that teachers don’t assign a number of pages anymore is because it’s too easy to manipulate pages. When students used to write on typewriters, it was common for teachers to assign essays in number of pages. With the adoption of computers in the classroom, teachers switched from pages to work count because it was too easy for the computers to manipulate the font size and page size. A writer might describe a person, place, object, or even memory of special significance. However, this type of essay is not description for description’s sake. The descriptive essay strives to communicate a deeper meaning through the description. In a descriptive essay, the writer should show, not tell, through the use of colorful words and sensory details. The best descriptive essays appeal to the reader’s emotions, with a result that is highly evocative. But, be alert, never remove the most convincing points or else your essay will lose its purpose. The first thing before you initiate the writing process is reading. You can underline important information or encircle the main question. In some cases, a two-or-three paragraph conclusion may be appropriate. As with introductions, the length of the conclusion should reflect the length of the essay. You may be the kind of writer who writes an introduction first in order to explore your own thinking on the topic. If so, remember that you may at a later stage need to compress your introduction. Reflection offers you the opportunity to consider how your personal experiences and observations shape your thinking and your acceptance of new ideas.

Why Does HE Get to Rule -Aristotle’s logical fallacies in the marital relation - Literature Essay Samples

Aristotle dedicates the first book of Politics to discuss households, and argues that to study the larger political community of a city-state, we need to first examine households as its building blocks (Politics, 5). The three major household relations Aristotle defines in Politics are master-slave, husband-wife and father-son, and they are all essentially ruler-ruled relations, as Aristotle lists that â€Å"free rules slaves, male rules female, and man rules child† (23). Aristotle believes that the natural inclination to rule or to be ruled is predetermined at birth, and there exists the natural inequality between the ruler and ruled (7). Moreover, Aristotle draws the analogy between domestic relationships and the larger political community because both households and city-states share similar ruler-ruled power dynamics. In the Nicomachean Ethics, Aristotle maps different household relations to different constitutions: â€Å"the association of a father with his sons bears th e form of monarchy, ., The association of man and wife seems to be aristocratic,, The association of brothers is like timocracy† (The Nicomachean Ethics, 115). While Aristotle assumes that all three domestic relations share the ruler-ruled power dynamics, examining Aristotle’s logic gap in proving men’s inherent superiority, loopholes in his theory of structure of souls, and his use of metaphors and parables all reveals that Aristotle fails to justify men’s superiority as natural rulers over females. This logical inconsistency in Politics invalidates the analogies between the marital relation and aristocracy/oligarchy in Ethics, ultimately compromising Aristotle’s overall analogy between households and city-states in both works. Aristotle leaves logical gap in his reasoning when trying to argue that men are naturally more suited to rule than women, as he fails to provide explicit explanations for what specific nature makes men superior. After justifying the slave-master relationship by arguing slaves are naturally better at physical labor while the masters are naturally better at deliberative reasoning, Aristotle continues to justify the husband-wife and father-child relations. By arguing that â€Å"For a male, unless he is somehow constituted contrary to nature, is naturally more fitted to lead than a female, and someone older and completely developed is naturally more fitted to lead than someone younger and incompletely developed† (Politics, 21). Here Aristotle arbitrarily asserts that â€Å"nature† makes males better rulers than females. Nevertheless, while the words â€Å"nature† and â€Å"naturally† occur twice in description of marital relation, Aristotle does not explain wh at specific natural characteristic of men makes them superior than women. Compared to the ambiguous assertion in the marital relation, Aristotle explicitly points out that the slaves are naturally ruled because their bodies are stronger, and fathers are natural ruler because they are older and more experienced. Hence Aristotle’s justification for men’s superior status over women is insufficient compared to other two relations. The fact that Aristotle skips the crucial step in reasoning suggests that he is not able to directly justify his assumption of natural inequality in marital relation. Other than the logical gap in his reasoning, Aristotle’s choice of words in describing the structure of souls also reflects the existence of external forces in determining womens and men’s unequal ability to rule, therefore contradicting the assumption of natural inequality. When discussing different structures of souls to further justify the inherent inequality between the ruler and the ruled, Aristotle claims that â€Å"the deliberative part of the soul is entirely missing from a slave; a woman has it but it lacks authority; a child has it but it is incompletely developed† (23). According to Aristotle’s previous arguments about nature, slaves lack the deliberative part of soul because their body is naturally more fitted to labor, and children’s deliberative part is naturally underdeveloped because of their age. However, why women have incomplete deliberative part of the soul remains ambiguous, because it is unclear what the â€Å"authority† refers to and why women lack this authority. â€Å"Authority† is different from â€Å"nature†, as the former is associated with rights or privileges given by the external environment such as social norms and conventions, while the latter is associated with internal characteristics that one is born with. If women need authority to exercise the deliberative part, then the incompleteness of deliberative part of their souls should not be due to nature, but is imposed by external forces. Therefore, Aristotle is unable to contribute the different deliberative powers of male and female solely to nature, as his choice of expression implies the existence of external influences in shaping the structure of souls. Moreover, the metaphor of statesman’s ruling in Aristotle’s description of the marital relationship also conflicts with the overall assumption of natural inequality by implying equal political status between men and women. To distinguish the husband-wife relation and the father-child relation, Aristotle compares the husband-wife relation to the â€Å"rule of a statesman† and father-child relation to â€Å"the rule of a king† (21-22). Aristotle describes the statesman’s rule as the following: â€Å"people take turns at ruling and being ruled, because they tend by nature to be on an equal footing and to differ in nothingâ€Å" (21). Here Aristotle is referring to the Athenian democratic system where aristocratic, male citizens with similar political interests decide by random lots who rules and represents the common interests temporarily. This analogy between men’s ruling over their wives and statesman’s ruling over other citizens is p roblematic because the rule of the statesman assumes the equal social status between the ruler and rest of the citizens, while Aristotle is trying to prove the natural inequality between male and female. Comparing women to citizens also contradicts the existing social conventions in ancient Greek, where women were mostly not considered to be citizens. Moreover, Aristotle concludes that â€Å"male is permanently related to female in this way† (22), which suggests that men’s ruling status is eternally fixed. However, as just defined in the rule of the statesman, citizens take turns to rule and to be ruled. This contradiction between the arbitrary, fixed designation in the rule of male and the fluid, temporary assignment of leadership in the rule of the statesman makes it questionable whether it is truly legitimate to assign men as the permanent rulers. Having recognized this discrepancy in the statesman metaphor suggests that men and women are naturally equal like the st atesmen and his citizens, and the superior political status of men over women should not be permanently fixed. While the statesman metaphor implies the potentially equal political status between male and female, the parable of Amasis and footbath suggests that women and men share the same inherent characters and are therefore inherently equal. When comparing the rule of husband over wife to the rule of the statesman, Aristotle states that while the ruler is equal with the other citizens, he needs to â€Å"distinguish himself in demeanor, title, or rank from the ruled†, just like Amasis and his footbath (22). The parable states that Amasis, who is from humble origin, becomes the king of Egypt. In order to earn respect from Egyptians, he makes his gold footbath into a statue of god to show that inferior status doesn’t mean inferior nature, because the same material could be arbitrarily made into objects with different utilities and receive different levels of respect. Similarly, while the ruler is superior in rank, demeanor and title, he is naturally equal with other citizens, jus t like the nobel statue and humble footbath are both made of gold. Applying this parable to the male-female relationship, though male rules over female, their natural characters are the same while they are shaped differently by social conventions and assigned to unequal social statuses. Moreover, the parable further illuminates why women lack the authority to exercise the deliberative part of the soul: women’s incomplete deliberative power is imposed by external authority, just as the gold is shaped into a lowly footbath by external forces. In both cases the appearances and results are independent of the inherent nature. As a result, while Aristotle claims that natural inequality between the ruler and the ruled exists among all three household relationships, such inequality is untenable in the marital relationship. Aristotle’s difficulty in proving males’ superior nature implies that male and female should have equal political status and intellectual ability. Applying Aristotle’s logical fallacies in Politics to his analogy between households and city-states leads to further contradictions, mainly reflected in his problematic mappings from the rule of man to aristocracy and the rule of women to oligarchy in Ethics. Aristotle defines aristocracy to be the rule of the best, and aristocracy degenerates into oligarchy when the rulers disregard common good and rule by their power and wealth, no longer being the most virtuous. (The Nicomachean Ethics, 155) Therefore the major difference between aristocracy and oligarchy is the virtue and legitimacy of the rulers. Aristotle argues that the rule of men within households resembles aristocracy becauseâ€Å"man rules in accordance with his worth† (155). The underlying assumption here is that men naturally have more virtue and deliberative power to be good rulers, and therefore have the â€Å"worth† to rule, just like the rule of the best in aristocracy. However, acording to previous analysis, Aristotle fails to prove this assumption in Politics, and without this assumption he is unable to conclude that the rule of men is the rule of the best, and therefore his analogy between rule of men and aristocracy is invalid. Similarly, the mapping from the rule of women to oligarchy is also problematic given logical fallacies in marital relation. To illustrate aristocracy’s superiority over oligarchy, Aristotle introduces the situation when women rule in the household. Aristotle argues that â€Å"Sometimes, however, women rule, because they are heiresses; so their rule is not in virtue of excellence but due to wealth and power, as in oligarchies† (155). According to this analogy, when heiresses rule the household, the rule by virtue degenerates into the rule by wealth and power, just like aristocracy degenerates into oligarchy. However, according to previous analysis of the structure of soul, the metaphor of statesman’s rule and the parable of Amasis, women and men possess the same inherent quality and potential to be the ruler. Therefore, it is problematic to compare the rule of women in households to oligarchy and to argue that women rule by power and wealth but not by virtue. As a result, Aristotle’s logical fallacies in proving the natural inequality in the marital relation invalidates the analogies between household relations to aristocracy and oligarchy, which makes his overall comparison between households and city-states an oversimplified framework that overlooks the internal complexity in the elements that he is comparing. In conclusion, understanding the logical inconsistency in the marital relationship in Politics illuminates the gap in Aristotle’s mapping from households to constitutions in Ethics. In his logical reasoning Aristotle arbitrarily asserts the husband’s natural ruling authority in the household, while his choices of words, use of metaphors and parables all imply that the inequality between male and female is not inherent but imposed by external forces. The difficulty to justify the natural inequality between male and female suggests that husband-wife relationship has more complexity than the slave-master and father-child relationships, and it’s problematic for Aristotle to oversimplify their commonalities. However, limited by his times and society, it would also be unlikely for Aristotle to acknowledge the idea of gender equality. While his logical reasoning is taking him away from proving the natural inequality, Aristotle still such inequality and maintains the ana logy between households and city-states. Indeed, using the more familiar and concrete notion of households helps to reveal the internal power dynamics within the relatively abstract city-states, and as Aristotle’s justification of the slave-master and the father-children relation is rigorous and intuitive, readers tend to believe the same rule also applies in the marital relation. However, the danger of using extended analogies and parallels in philosophical reasoning is that the logical fallacy of one element would undermine the overarching argument and whole framework. Therefore, as readers we should be very cautious about the oversimplification of frameworks and analogies in philosophical texts, and always bear in mind to examine the logical consistencies across the author’s arguments. Work Cited Aristotle. Politics. Translated by C D. C. Reeve, Indianapolis, Ind: Hackett Pub, 1998. Print. Aristotle. The Nicomachean Ethics. Translated by W D. Ross, and Lesley Brown, Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009. Print.

My Experience At Boca Raton Elementary School - 931 Words

Walking up to Boca Raton Elementary School all I could think of was, wow I’m about to enter this school and start my field experience. It’s all I ever wanted to do and it was finally coming true. I was so nervous, yet so excited. I didn’t know what to expect, were the kids going to like me, would I be any help in the classroom? Mrs. Vickers made me feel so welcome and from the start started telling me everything that was planned for the day. She taught first grade and has only been teaching for five years. While teaching, she was obtaining her masters degree at FAU. From the moment I stepped foot in the classroom, I started learning different information about the school. I learned that Boca Raton Elementary School was a Title 1 school, which means the school gets financial assistance to help ensure that all children meet challenging state academic standards. The school doesn’t have a lot of classrooms, due to a charter school opening up near by and parents sending their children over there. The first day of class was very interesting, everyone was wearing orange for bully prevention. I think it’s very important for schools to teach students about bullying, and why everyone should be treated the way they want to be treated. As I was walking in class, one of Mrs. Vickers students was pulled to the side for bullying someone in the cafeteria. She asked her why she did that and she couldn’t give her an answer. Mrs. Vickers told the young girl that she was going to call herShow MoreRelated THE IMPACT OF KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT PRACTICES IN IMPROVING STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES65118 Words   |  261 Pagesassistance of many individuals. First and foremost, I would like to thank my supervisor, Mr. Stewart Martin, who was always ready and eager to help me at each step of the way, and whose feedback and suggestions helped ensure that this would become a quality piece of scholarly work. Mr. Martin’s critically analytical questioning has been invaluable in helping me clarify ideas and his thoughtfulness and scholarly insights have contributed to my thinking and writing. I will remain forever grateful for the adviceRead MoreDeveloping Management Skills404131 Words   |  1617 Pagesof Empowerment 447 Self-Efficacy 447 Self-Determination 448 Personal Consequence 449 Meaning 449 Trust 450 Review of Empowerment Dimensions 451 How to Develop Empowerment 451 Articulating a Clear Vision and Goals 452 Fostering Personal Mastery Experiences 453 Modeling 454 Providing Support 454 Emotional Arousal 455 Providing Information 456 Providing Resources 457 Connecting to Outcomes 457 Creating Confidence 458 Review of Empowerment Principles 459 Inhibitors to Empowerment 461 Attitudes AboutRead MoreFundamentals of Hrm263904 Words   |  1056 Pagestracking, and more manage time better study smarter save money From multiple study paths, to self-assessment, to a wealth of interactive visual and audio resources, WileyPLUS gives you everything you need to personalize the teaching and learning experience.  » F i n d o u t h ow t o M A K E I T YO U R S  » www.wileyplus.com ALL THE HELP, RESOURCES, AND PERSONAL SUPPORT YOU AND YOUR STUDENTS NEED! 2-Minute Tutorials and all of the resources you your students need to get started www.wileyplus

Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer

Question: Discuss about the Chief Executive and Chief Financial Officer. Answer: Introduction: As per the annual reports of the corporation David Jones, the chief executive officer of the organization is John Dixon (2016 - ). John Dixon assumed the position of the chief executive officer after the completion of the term of the preceding chief executive officer Paul Zahra. However, Brad Soller acted as the chief financial officer of David Jones as per the annual report of the year 2012. The annual report mentions the executive committee that the chief financial officer of the company is Ashley Gardner. Figure 1: Donna Player and David Jones CEO John Dixon John Dixon is the chief executive officer of David Jones Limited of the parent entity Woolworths Holdings Limited during the period 2016 (David Jones 2016). The chief executive officer worked as the Executive Director of general merchandise at the Marks Spencer Group Plc during the period October 2012 to July 2015 (David Jones 2016). He also served as the Member of Management Board of the Marks Spencer. In addition to this, John Dixon also previously also served as the Executive Director of Food of Marks Spencer Group Plc since the year 2009 and as the chief of Retail since the year 2012 (David Jones 2016). Furthermore, the analysis of the background of the present CEO of David Jones, Mr. Dixon reveals the fact that he also served as the Directorof MS Direct at Marks Spencer Group plc. He too served as the Director of Food division of the company during the period July 2008 and again as Director of e-Commerce. The background of Mr. Dixon discloses the fact that he also served as the Executive Assistant to the CEO of Stuart Rose during the period 2004. The study of the background of Mr. Dixon reveals the fact that he started his career in Marks and Spencer in UK in the department of store management prior to switching to Paris for approximately three years where John Dixon held a range of commercial managing roles in different European stores and in the Paris Head Office. Thereafter, John Dixon also attended the head office of the located in UK during the year 1992 in the position of a Food buyer in Prepared Foods (Bloomberg.com 2016). The annual report mentions that the chief financial officer of the company David Jones is Mr. Ashley John Gardner . The study of the background of the company reveals the fact that John Dixon served as the Chief Financial Officer of Just Group Limited during the period 2007 to 2016 (Bloomberg.com 2016). Again, Mr. Gardner also worked as Company Secretary of the company Country Road Ltd. for the duration 2002 to 2006. In addition to this, Mr. Ashley John Gardner also served as General Manager of Finance as well as Chief Financial Officer of the company Country Road Ltd. during the period 2003 to 2006. Furthermore, the detailed study of the background of the corporate discloses that he also served as Chief Financial Officer of the company Premier Investments Limited. Thereafter, Mr. Ashley John Gardner also worked with Country Road Ltd. during the year 2000 (Bloomberg.com 2016). Mr. Ashley John Gardner too worked as the Executive Director of the corporation Just Group Ltd. during the p eriod 2011 to 2016. Subsequently, he served as Executive Director of the company Country Road Ltd. for the duration January 31, 2006 to December 31, 2006. The report also reveals the fact the educational qualification of Mr. Ashley John Gardner. He holds a B.Com (Hons) degree from University of Melbourne and he is a practised Chartered Accountant (Bloomberg.com 2016). References David Jones. 2016.Executive Committee. [online] Available at: https://www.davidjones.com.au/About-David-Jones/Executive-Management [Accessed 7 Sep. 2016]. Bloomberg.com. 2016.Stocks - Bloomberg. [online] Available at: https://www.bloomberg.com/research/stocks/people/person.asp?personId=30965375privcapId=874723 [Accessed 7 Sep. 2016].

Manage Human resources free essay sample

1. Outline the difference between strategic plans and operational plans Strategic plans are the long term plans and goals of an organisation, whereas operational plans are shorter term; more about detailing the day to day operations of the organisation. Operational plans need to keep the strategic goals in mind so that the organisation will reach their longer term goals. HR requirements are necessary both in strategic and operational plans. Within operational plans, the HR strategies are important to enable the employees and human sector of the organisation to function appropriately. The human element of an organisation must be aware of their roles, adequately trained and treated fairly to ensure they carry out operational tasks. This, is turn, enables the strategic plans to work. 2. Explain how performance management works Performance management is successful when the expectations and obligations of employees align with the strategic plan of the organisation. Performance management should ensure that employees’ behaviour and outputs are consistent with the long term goals of the organisation and that the two complement each other. We will write a custom essay sample on Manage Human resources or any similar topic specifically for you Do Not WasteYour Time HIRE WRITER Only 13.90 / page If an employee is not meeting the objectives set out by the strategic and operational plans, then it is up to the HR manager to performance manage the employee to fit into these plans or seek employment elsewhere. Therefore, performance management is not only a way to ensure that employees are supporting the organisation towards its strategic goals, but also a way in which an employee can develop skills and learn more about their own career goals. 3. Why do HR personnel need to be aware of relevant legislation? There is a lot of legislation which HR personnel need to be aware of and it is important that it is enforced and taken into account when making HR decisions. Employees need to be treated fairly and have confidence in the organisation that they work for. This can be ensured if the relevant employment and workplace legislation is followed. If this legislation is not followed, it can also be costly for the organisation in the form of fines and compensation. The legislation which applies to human resource operations are: Fairwork Act 2009 National Employment standards Long service leave act Superannuation legislation Taxation legislation and fringe benefits Workplace Health and Safety Anti-discrimination legislation Workers compensation The Fair Work Act 2009 establishes a safety net of employee entitlements with the National Employment Standards (NES) and modern awards. In some cases, an employee’s entitlements change to meet the minimum entitlements under the NES, which prevail over any instrument (including former State awards and State agreements) that is less beneficial than the entitlements under the NES. This means that if an employee is covered by an award, agreement, former State award or State agreement or contract of employment, it cannot provide less than the NES entitlements. Rules relating to other employment matters governed by the Fair Work Act 2009 also apply to those employers and employees new to the national system from 1 January 2010. This includes (but is not limited to): 1 termination of employment 2 enterprise bargaining 3 industrial action 4 right of entry 5 general protections 6 record-keeping requirements. 4. What is the aim of WHS legislation and what responsibilities does it place on employers? The Occupational Health and Safety Act 2004 is the legislative and administrative measures to improve occupational health and safety in Victoria. The Act sets out the key principles, duties and rights in relation to occupational health and safety. The general nature of the duties imposed by the Act means that they cover a very wide variety of circumstances, do not quickly become outdated and provide flexibility to determine what needs to be done to comply. As an employer you must provide a safe and healthy workplace for your workers and contractors. This includes: providing and maintaining safe plant(such as machinery and equipment) and safe systems of work (such as controlling entry to high risk areas, controlling work pace and frequency and providing systems to prevent falls from heights) implementing arrangements for the safe use, handling, storage and transport of chemicals (such as dangerous goods and other harmful materials) maintaining the workplace in a safe condition (such as ensuring fire exits are not blocked, emergency equipment is serviceable, and the worksite is generally tidy) providing workers and contractors with adequate facilities (such as clean toilets, cool and clean drinking water, and hygienic eating areas) making sure workers have adequate information, instruction, training and supervision to work in a safe and healthy manner. An employer must also: adequately monitor your workers health (such as providing hearing tests for workers exposed to high noise levels, providing blood tests for workers exposed to lead and monitoring fatigue levels of transport and other workers) keep information and records relevant to your workers health and safety (such as records of biological monitoring, asbestos assessments, first aid records and relevant medical information) employ or engage people with the necessary qualifications or expertise to advise you on health and safety issues affecting your workers Consult with employees on matters that may directly affect their health, safety or welfare. Where the employees are represented by a health and safety representative (HSR), the HSR must also be involved in the consultation nominate a senior management representative (or yourself) to deal with workers and their health and safety representatives in resolving health and safety issues at the workplace provide your workers with information in the appropriate languages about your workplace health and safety arrangements, including the names of those to whom the workers can make an inquiry or complaint. When hiring new employees you should inform them, in writing, of the nature of the work and ask if they have any pre-existing injury or illness that may be affected by the work. You should also inform them, in writing, that failing to notify or hiding a pre-existing injury or illness which might be affected by the nature of the proposed employment, could result in that injury or illness being ineligible for future compensation claims. Employers must ensure that other people (such as their customers, visitors and the general public) are not endangered by the conduct of your business (for example, by providing protection from falling debris around construction sites, controlling traffic access to your workplace and limiting public access within the workplace). Employers have additional specific obligations if their business involves the: manufacture, importation, transportation, supply, storage, handling or use of dangerous goods design, manufacture, importation, supply, erection or installation of plant manufacture, importation, or supply of substances. Employers also have obligations to: meet particular licensing, registration and certification requirements immediately notify WorkSafe of certain dangerous incidents co-operate with WorkSafe Inspectors  omply with Inspectors Notices and Written Directions issued by Worksafe inspectors Relevant legislation must be included in induction processes for new staff and H R must provide training within the specific areas. Employees should be made aware of their legal rights and responsibilities, as well as their employers. Policies and procedures must ensure to be in line with all relevant legislations, referring to the specific legislative requirements when needed. Policies and procedures must also take into account both emotional and physical health aspects when it comes to WHS legislation. Assessment 3 Project 1 1. I have chosen to undertake delivery of recruitment services for Cooinda Hill. The services which will be provided are: Development of position descriptions Advertising of vacant positions Interviewing process Induction process The aim of my services will be to recruit professionals as required to Cooinda Hill who fit the needs of the organisation and who can assist Cooinda Hill to reach its strategic goals. Client needs assessment form Client name: Services required (please tick): Development of position descriptions Advertising vacant positions Interview process Induction process Performance reviews Performance management Please answer the questions below relevant to your services required. Do you currently have position descriptions for all positions within the organisation? I will be creative in the advertising medium used to try to attract relevant possible appointees and promote the less tangible attributes of the positions, such as â€Å"tree change† or excellent community facilities and support for the organisation. Timelines Within the first two months all Position Descriptions will be reviewed and a gap analysis done on the current workforce. Succession plans will also be reviewed and considered in the process. A vacant position will be advertised within two weeks of the vacancy being identified. Closing date for applications will be three weeks from advertising date. First round interviews will be held within one week from closing date of applications. Applicants will be informed of outcome within one week. The second round interviews and reference checks will occur within one week of this. Successful applicants will be informed within one week of last interview. An appointment will be made approximately 4 weeks after closing date of applications. This may dependent on availability of applicant. If the process is to take longer than 4 weeks, this will be only considered in conjunction with Cooinda Hill. KPIs Adherence to the above timelines Consultation with Cooinda Hill at times indicated Successful appointment of people into vacant positions Adherence to legislative requirements Provision of services for 12 months Provision of services as outlined in this proposal

Eulogy Examples and Definition

Eulogy Examples and Definition From the Greek word, praise, a eulogy is a formal expression of praise for someone who has recently died. Although eulogies are traditionally regarded as a form of epideictic rhetoric, on occasion they may also serve a deliberative function.   Examples of a Eulogy It is hard to eulogize any manto capture in words, not just the facts and the dates that make a life, but the essential truth of a person: their private joys and sorrows, the quiet moments and unique qualities that illuminate someone’s soul. (President Barack Obama, speech at the memorial service for former South African president Nelson Mandela, December 10, 2013) Ted Kennedys Eulogy for His Brother Robert My brother need not be idealized, or enlarged in death beyond what he was in life; to be remembered simply as a good and decent man, who saw wrong and tried to right it, saw suffering and tried to heal it, saw war and tried to stop it. Those of us who loved him and who take him to his rest today, pray that what he was to us and what he wished for others will some day come to pass for all the world. As he said many times, in many parts of this nation, to those he touched and who sought to touch him: Some men see things as they are and say why. I dream things that never were and say why not. (Edward Kennedy, service for Robert Kennedy, June 8, 1968) Deliberative Eulogies In their discussion of generic hybrids, [K.M.] Jamieson and [K.K.] Campbell ([Quarterly Journal of Speech,] 1982) focused on the introduction of deliberative appeals in a ceremonial eulogya deliberative eulogy. Such hybrids, they suggested, are most common in the cases of well-known public figures but are not necessarily restricted to these cases. When a small child falls victim to gang violence, the priest or minister may use the occasion of the funeral eulogy to encourage public policy changes designed to stem the tide of urban decay. Eulogies also may be fused with other genres. (James Jasinski, Sourcebook on Rhetoric. Sage, 2001) Dr. Kings Eulogy for the Victims of the Birmingham Church Bombing This afternoon we gather in the quiet of this sanctuary to pay our last tribute of respect to these beautiful children of God. They entered the stage of history just a few years ago, and in the brief years that they were privileged to act on this mortal stage, they played their parts exceedingly well. Now the curtain falls; they move through the exit; the drama of their earthly life comes to a close. They are now committed back to that eternity from which they came. These children- unoffending, innocent, and beautiful- were the victims of one of the most vicious and tragic crimes ever perpetrated against humanity. . . . And yet they died nobly. They are the martyred heroines of a holy crusade for freedom and human dignity. And so this afternoon in a real sense they have something to say to each of us in their death. They have something to say to every minister of the gospel who has remained silent behind the safe security of stained-glass windows. They have something to say to every politician who has fed his constituents with the stale bread of hatred and the spoiled meat of racism. They have something to say to a federal government that has compromised with the undemocratic practices of southern Dixiecrats and the blatant hypocrisy of right-wing northern Republicans. They have something to say to every Negro who has passively accepted the evil system of segregation and who has stood on the sidelines in a mighty struggle for justice. They say to each of us, black and white alike, that we must substitute courage for caution. They say to us that we must be concerned not merely about who murdered them , but about the system, the way of life, the philosophy which produced the murderers. Their death says to us that we must work passionately and unrelentingly for the realization of the American dream. . . .(Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., from his eulogy for the young victims of the Sixteenth Street Baptist Church Bombing in Birmingham, Alabama, Sep. 18, 1963) Using Humor: John Cleeses Eulogy for Graham Chapman Graham Chapman, the co-author of the Parrot Sketch, is no more. He has ceased to be. Bereft of life, he rests in peace. Hes kicked the bucket, hopped the twig, bit the dust, snuffed it, breathed his last, and gone to meet the great Head of Light Entertainment in the sky. And I guess that were all thinking how sad it is that a man of such talent, of such capability for kindness, of such unusual intelligence, should now so suddenly be spirited away at the age of only 48, before hed achieved many of the things of which he was capable, and before hed had enough fun. Well, I feel that I should say: nonsense. Good riddance to him, the freeloading bastard, I hope he fries. And the reason I feel I should say this is he would never forgive me if I didnt, if I threw away this glorious opportunity to shock you all on his behalf. Anything for him but mindless good taste. (John Cleese, Dec. 6, 1989) Jack Handeys Eulogy for Himself We are gathered here, way far in the future, for the funeral of Jack Handey, the world’s oldest man. He died suddenly in bed, according to his wife, Miss France. No one is really sure how old Jack was, but some think he may have been born as long ago as the twentieth century. He passed away after a long, courageous battle with honky-tonkin’ and alley-cattin’. . . As hard as it is to believe, he never sold a single painting during his lifetime, or even painted one. Some of the greatest advances in architecture, medicine, and theatre were not opposed by him, and he did little to sabotage them. . . . Generous even with his organs, he has asked that his eyes be donated to a blind person. Also his glasses. His skeleton, equipped with a spring that will suddenly propel it to a full standing position, will be used to educate kindergartners. . . . So let us celebrate his death, and not mourn. However, those who appear to be a little too happy will be asked to leave. (Jack Handey, How I Want to Be Remembered. The New Yorker, March 31, 2008)

Toddlers Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 250 words

Toddlers - Research Paper Example Due to perceived milk intolerance and chronic eczema history, after weaning, the parent started feeding him daily with 1.5  litres of rice beverage, which is very low in protein content compared to caloric ingestion. Typical features of kwashiorkor were apparent in the child and kwashiorkor therapy was introduced, leading to a remarkable response to re-feeding and within three  weeks, a complete oedema resolution and a rising serum albumin was observed. After one  year, the child was thriving on a milk-based paediatric nutritional-supplemented regular diet. In the second case,  rickets were detected in a 17-month-old male child who was mature during birth, was breastfed until the age of ten months and after weaning, the parent fed him with a calcium/vitamin D- deficient soy health food beverage. The patient had inadequate exposure to the sun owing to parental career demands. He had grown and developed usually up nine months when an examination revealed clinical features of ri ckets. Calcium supplements and ergocalciferol were administered and within six  months, he had responded to therapy remarkably. Until the late 1920s when there was the introduction of commercially prepared vitamin D milk enrichment, in the US, nutritional rickets was a chief paediatric health plague.